Firstly Rochford not totally opposed to traveller caravan pitches
SOUTH Essex will have to find an extra 185 official traveller caravan pitches if new regional government proposals are accepted.
UNLIKE other south Essex districts, Rochford is not totally opposed to extra pitches.
Deputy leader Keith Hudson said he had no objection to a small, properly-regulated site, so long as it did not affect local residents and had adequate road access.
He added: “I believe a site for travellers should be just that – somewhere they can stay for a short time before they move on.”
Hullbridge 500 new homes plan sparks public anger from the Echo
By Michael Casey
RESIDENTS are furious over plans for hundreds of homes in a quiet village.
About 500 new homes could be built in Hullbridge by 2021, under revisions to Rochford District Council’s new development plan.
The village was one of the areas earmarked to take an increased amount of housing when the number of new homes in Rayleigh was slashed from 1,800 to 720, following huge pressure from the town’s residents.
This has been printed in the “Community Voice” leaflet. “Community Voice” is the periodic newsletter of the Hawkwell Residents’ Association which owns a registered political party called Hawkwell Residents. The Hawkwell Residents registered political party has two seats on Hawkwell Parish Council.
We hear on the grapevine that someone at the Council is not very happy with the Hawkwell Residents Association about this as all calls to the Head of Planning are supposed to be screened by a Personal Assistant.
We looked at the NEW Political Structure at Rochford District Council about six months ago.
Here is the evidence that it does not work
At the Cabinet Meetings no one else can speak, not even the Ordinary Councillors that you elected to represent YOU, and you can’t even hear what was agreed.
http://onlinefocus.org/?p=867 Grange Community Centre : Liberal Democrats : Uh Oh, Looks Like Chris Misunderstood.
Heaven forbid if the nine super councillors in the Cabinet get executive powers over budget and personal decision making in 2009 !!
The RDC Central Area Committee met in Hullbridge tonight. About 100 people attended. By and large they left unhappy. Here are a couple of quotes from those who spoke as they left. “This meeting has been carefully orchestrated so that we did not talk about what WE wanted”. “The meeting has been all about dog crap and not about people.” My take from those who raised issues at the beginning of the meeting was that the public wanted to talk about current planning issues and the new allocation of houses to Hullbridge. The first questioner wanted to know how the allocation that was consulted upon in May/June 2007, turned into 400 houses for Hullbridge. No answer was given from the Chair apart from “it’s all back in the melting pot.”
The Rochford District Council Review Committee is to take evidence from the public following the intervention of independent councillor, John Mason.
Officers presented a project plan to the last Review Committee which had not been tabled on the Agenda. One Tory Councillor was concerned that this had not been drawn up by Members and the obvious unseen nature of the proposals.
AN AMBITIOUS £12million project is planned to recreate the lost landscape of Wallasea Island.
The RSPB today announced details of the Wallasea Island Wild Coast Project, to return the farmland back to coastal wetland to attract rare birds back to an area that has not nested in for about 400 years.
The charity hopes to raise enough money to buy three quarters of the island, farmed by Wallasea Farms.
advertisementThe cash will also fund engineering work to let water back on to the land through a series of pipes in the current sea wall.
Villagers to fight housing proposal
By Geoff Percival
ANGRY villagers plan to set up an action group to oppose the building of 400 new homes in the area.
Rochford District Council’s blueprint for development until 2021 includes a proposal for 365 homes in Hawkwell, but only 36 in neighbouring Hockley.
The figure for Hawkwell had to be increased because of an agreement to cut the number of homes proposed for Rayleigh from 1,800 to 740.
The agreement followed fierce campaigning from Rayleigh residents, who complained the town would have taken more than half the district’s housing allocation.
We have been asked to say whether the Mount Bovers land is completely safe from development or not. Let’s look at the evidence we have.
Well bearing in mind that either the owners, or an agent for the owners, put the land forward for consideration then perhaps they have an argument that suggests that it could be developed for housing. That is a concern.
And the Head of Planning at RDC, Shaun Scrutton would not agree that RDC had said that the Mount Bovers Land could be described as “sacrosanct” or “common land” as claimed by a resident at the public meeting at Belchamps.
The meeting was so well attended that the organisers, Jamie Popplewell and his neighbours in Mount Bovers Lane, asked Belchamps if they could move the meeting to the larger upper hall. Luckily, Belchamps were happy to do this otherwise about 90 people would not have been able to get in because the small hall only held 60.
Over 150 concerned residents attended mainly because of the possible threat of new housing being allocated to the Mount Bovers field but also the threats to land at Thorpe Road and behind Rectory Road adjoining Windsor Gardens and Clements Hall.
Rochford District Residents organised a Fun Quiz Night at Hawkwell Village Hall on Friday, 12 October. All profit went to the Southend University Hospital, Strokebusters Appeal. Consultant Tony O’Brien gave a short talk on Strokebusters and although his quiz team did not win, they took away donations of £673.
Fortnightly Rubbish Collections on Agenda
ROCHFORD district councillors are set discuss the controversial issue of fortnightly rubbish collections as their current waste contract comes up for renewal.
John Mason, a councillor who represents Rochford district, said he did not believe fortnightly waste collections were feasible until the range of recyclables and composting was extended. He said: “The grey, general waste bins are going to get too full, unless more can be taken out of them to recycle.
“The Council can’t just say, it’s going to have to be grey bins every fortnight’ without any changes, because it’s simply not going to work.
The Rochford Independent has been asked by residents to look at the original the housing allocations actually put forward to the public in the recent consultation and find out which parts of the Rochford District are the unlucky ones which receive the increase of 1060 houses from the Conservative Party resulting from the reduction in the allocation to Rayleigh.
- Rochford and Ashingdon increased by only 125 from 1000 to 1125
- Hawkwell and Hockley 400 (no change but Hawkwell West gets the lot !!)
- Smaller Settlements (Hullbridge,Canewdon,Stambridge & Great Wakering) increased by a MASSIVE 555 to 1055
Clerk to Hawkwell Parish Council
I am writing further to our conversation this morning concerning the RDC public consultation on the LDF Core Strategy which took place in May and June of this year.
As a District Councillor I informed residents by Newsletter that the RDC allocation to Hawkwell and Hockley was 400. The District Council also released details of those landowners who had put their land forward for consideration of allocation for development. You can find maps and descriptions on the RDC web site at http://www.rochford.gov.uk/rdc/main.asp?page=1101
A woman in a hot air balloon realises she is lost. She lowers her altitude and spots a man fishing at the lake near Bradley Way in Rochford.
She shouts to him, “Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I don’t know where I am.”
The man consults his portable GPS and replies, “You’re in a hot air balloon, approximately 21 feet above a ground elevation of 50 feet above sea level. You are at 51°34’47.26″ north latitude and 0°42’22.89” east longitude.
Residents have contacted their independent District Councillor, John Mason, and have asked him to provide them with information and campaign assistance.
This follows the announcement by the Conservative Party running Rochford District Council that 365 new houses should be built in Hawkwell. As the current position shows for Hawkwell that there are four major sites likely to have been earmarked for development residents in Hawkwell have added 2 + 2 and come up with 4 !! They can’t guess which of the four sites might be chosen so they have decided to set up Action Groups to oppose development.
365 Houses Allocated by Conservative Party to Hawkwell West but only 36 houses to Hockley
So far the only land put forward is all in Hawkwell West – 53.3 hectares = 1599 to 2665 houses at the density required by Government of 30-50 houses per hectare.
Off Thorpe Road (residential but ‘open to discussion’) 11 hectares = 330 to 550
South of Ironwell Lane 0.3 Hectares = 10 to 17
East of Clements Hall Sports Centre (‘residential or mixed use’) 14.6 hectares = 450 to 750
Magees Nursery, Windsor Gardens 3.1 hectares = 90 to150
Head of Planning and Transportation
Rochford District Council
Options for Rochford District Core Strategy – LDF Consultation
You asked me to submit any Options that Rochford District Residents (RDR) had on the LDF before 30 September.
In terms of the Options put forward by the Conservative Party, RDR would like to see a copy of the proposal together with all supporting papers if this has already been received by the Council before the deadline of 30 September. If the proposal is not complete then I would like to receive a copy on 1 October please.
The Central Area Committee on 20 September in Hawkwell Village Hall considered a request by Hawkwell Parish Council for a Teen Shelter to be sited on the field adjoining Clements Hall Leisure Centre. No details had been submitted before the meeting but the Central Area Committee was supposed to recommend this in principle to the Executive Board. A large number of residents from Hawkwell West, my Ward, attended and some spoke out very strongly against this proposal. Because no details had been submitted before the meeting no one knew if it required Planning Permission or not. If it did not then the Chairman, also a Member for Hawkwell West but a Tory (Executive Councillor Derek (Steve) Stansby), said that the Executive Board would approve it. Not so said an Officer and indeed Councillor Hudson, Deputy Leader of the Council, but the Chairman, wishing to push this through regardless of local opinion, the people he represents, insisted otherwise. Under the circumstances I publicly voted against because it went against the views of residents and I had not even seen the details. So much for local consultation. Indeed I discovered in the Minutes of Hawkwell Parish Council that only 6 adults had attended their public meeting – so the rest,54,were young people and Parish Councillors.