Rochford Core Strategy Costs Already at £2.1 Million
August 11, 2013 by Editor
£2.1 million of Public money has been poured into R&D costs of Developers which they do not pay for.
You did !!
Surely the Coalition Government should have found some sort of mechanism for this public money to be recouped from the profits made by each developer?
Rochford District Council has spent £2.1m plus over the past 7 years to April 2013 on the Core Strategy.
Within that £350,000 to Consultants.
£1 million came from Council Tax and £1.1 million from Government Grants making £2.1 million overall.
All money paid by you in Taxes.
How do I know? Because as Members of Rochford District Council (independents) Christine and I asked the question on behalf of residents.
If you want to see the full information supplied to us go here.
How do we see things?
- The Conservative Party promised to reduce the extent or even stop unwelcome development in their manifesto for the 2010 General Election.
- The National House Building Federation lobbied the new Government over many months and The Chancellor of the Exchequer reversed the manifesto promises by creating a policy for economic recovery based on house building; boom and bust repeated.
- Localism was promised in 2010 with local communities having a say in development was promised but all it meant was that Conservative controlled Councils would decide instead.
- The views of local communities calling for a stop were ignored.
- The reductions proposed by the Conservative Administration of Rochford District Council in mid 2012 were rejected and RDC now has yearly targets based on the Labour Regional Spatial Strategy coupled with a legally obligated Review for more years and more houses to meet the shortfall for adopting the Plan too late and finishing the build profile in the Plan years too early.
- The Conservative Secretary of State, Eric Pickles, failed to dismantle the Regional Housing Policies (RSS) of the previous Labour Government until January 2013. Too late to matter as the Rochford Core Strategy was Approved by a Government Inspector and Adopted in December 2011 at 250 new houses p.a. rather than the preferred RDC number of 190 p.a.
- So why has RDC not used the change in the law to revert to 190 p.a.?
- Surely residents would have expected the Council to have reduced the number of houses in the Allocation of Sites which is in Public Inquiry in September?
- The Hawkwell West development at The Christmas Tree Farm (Clements Gate) went ahead despite the fact that there has been no formal decision on the site at the Public Inquiry. So the Allocation of Sites could have been pulled until the numbers could have been reduced without opening the District up to the promised free for all from developers building even more houses.
- Too late for Hall Road (600), Brays Lane (100) and Hawkwell (175) where plans are already passed but a benefit of reduction in Hullbridge and Rayleigh.