Could there be a Reduction in House Building Targets in Rochford District
July 8, 2010 by Editor · Leave a Comment
Yes, there could be, but many residents who listened to and read the promises made about over development of the green belt at the General and Local Election in 2010 think that the new Government has stopped all building on green belt.
No that is not the case, far, far from it.
Well the RSS Housing targets have been revoked. What does that mean then?
It could mean this;
-10.9%
East of England Regional Assembly (EERA)
23,900 local authority option one figure
26,830 current RSS figure
[Source http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/ihstory.aspx?storycode=6508627]
Rochford Core Strategy Housing Location Hearings
June 26, 2010 by Editor · Leave a Comment
With all the recent talk and focus on the The Pickles Letter it has been easy to forget that the Public Examinaton of the Rochford Core Strategy is still continuing under the direction of Government Planning Inspector, Miss Laura Graham. Indeed the Hearing on Housing that was attended by many residents and residents groups was only on 12 May 2010.
During the Hearings many questions were asked and challenges made of the Council.
Miss Graham asked the Council to provide the following additional information by 11 June.
- Vision
- Housing location audit trail
What local councils could do to stop an existing or emerging Core Strategy
June 24, 2010 by Editor · Leave a Comment
Rochford District Council says in its Press Release that it has to continue to proceed with its Core Strategy (CS) because although the Secretary of State, Eric Pickles, has announced the new Government’s intention to abolish the Regional Housing Targets (RSS) it has not passed legislation.
It has been said by other planners that Section 79 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 sets out the Secretary of State’s reserve power to revoke a regional strategy where the Secretary of State thinks it, necessary or, expedient to do so.
Eric Pickles’ Letter
June 1, 2010 by Editor · Leave a Comment
Having taken advice on behalf of concerned residents………..
“Ministerial proposals do not have legal force until the necessary legislative provisions have been enacted, the statement and the weight to be attached to it as a material planning consideration have to be viewed in this context.”
Sent to all Chief Planners on 27 May 2010 by The Rt Hon Eric Pickles MP, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
ABOLITION OF REGIONAL STRATEGIES
Pickles makes a first move on The Core Strategy
June 1, 2010 by Editor · Leave a Comment
I have asked RDC for a legal opinion on the following letter.
What legal status does this letter have to determine a course of action by a Planning Authority?
Or is it only an informative?
Sent to all Chief Planners on 27 May 2010 by The Rt Hon Eric Pickles MP, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
ABOLITION OF REGIONAL STRATEGIES
I am writing to you today to highlight our commitment in the coalition agreements where we very clearly set out our intention to rapidly abolish Regional Strategies and return decision making powers on housing and planning to local councils. Consequently, decisions on housing supply (including the provision of travellers sites) will rest with Local Planning Authorities without the framework of regional numbers and plans.
No More Info on Housing Allocations likely before Local Elections
February 12, 2008 by Editor · Leave a Comment
I believe that one of my roles as a District Councillor is to communicate as often as I can so that residents are informed.
Sometimes you have to ask some questions about upcoming issues.
The Rochford Lib Dems suggest that two LDF subcommittee meetings for April have been cancelled by the Conservative Group.
No more homes for Hawkwell – The Rochford Independent’s Letter in the Echo
February 8, 2008 by Editor · Leave a Comment
As a District Councillor for Hawkwell West I have a duty to represent my Ward as well as the District. I am not doing this to preserve my re-election chances. I promised residents that I would protect green belt and I will do my best.
No more homes for Hawkwell
I am campaigning against the housing allocation for Hawkwell.
If an additional 365 homes were to be built in the village the road infrastructure in would have to be improved to cope.
In addition there are many more homes to be built in Rochford district where car movements could cause those people to travel through Hawkwell.
Would Rochford Square Pedestrianisation Close Shops?
February 8, 2008 by Editor · Leave a Comment
Echo Story – Rochford Market Square pedestrianisation hope
Council leader Terry Cutmore said: “In Rochford, many people would like to see a central area free from traffic and we are looking to pedestrianise Market Square.
The Rochford Independent Comment
Rayleigh Homes – No Change Says Tory Leader
February 8, 2008 by Editor · Leave a Comment
From the Echo – 8 February
Rayleigh homes row
LIB Dems on Rochford District Council have been accused of scaremongering by suggesting 1,800 new homes could still be forced on Rayleigh.
The Lib Dem Focus website, run by group leader Chris Black, is claiming ruling Tories may revise the current suggested figure for the number of homes the town must take to meet Government housing demands.
The website says: “It’s possible officers might suggest a variation of the 740 figure for Rayleigh. “The Conservative group could backtrack. After all, there’s been no council vote on their figures, just a publicly stated proposal. “Once the elections are over, the Tories will have some new members, replacing old ones. They might well have a new leader.”
Allocation of new homes in Rochford District
January 25, 2008 by Editor · Leave a Comment
The Rochford Independent has seen the article by Geoff Percival in the Echo.
http://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/local/display.var.1992104.0.0.php
I would invite you to read this if you have not seen it.
I am an independent district councillor for Hawkwell West and I have been campaigning with residents against the housing allocation for some months now. The support from Hawkwell Parish Council is welcomed.
Hawkwell Parish Council – 2007 to 2011
May 20, 2007 by Editor · Leave a Comment
The Local Government Elections in May 2007 saw “No Contest” for any seat on Hawkwell Parish Council.
There are 17 seats on Hawkwell Parish Council but only 14 of those are filled. Consequently there was little change.
There are 3 Vacancies which the Council will have to try to co-opt.
Half of the 14 Councillors represent registered political parties:
4 Labour Councillors, 1 Conservative Councillor, 2 Hawkwell Residents Councillors
Elections – Did you know this?
May 20, 2007 by Editor · Leave a Comment
Just a reminder if it comes up again !!
Section 106, Representation of the People Act 1983, Crown Prosecution Service Special Cases Division
Criticism of public acts, even if extravagant and perverse,or of a person’s political career and conduct, does not fall within the Section.
All is fair in love and war and, well, that’s politics !!
Financial Concerns over Parish Council Decision
September 19, 2006 by Editor · 2 Comments
Some years ago the council tax raised by Hawkwell Parish Council was much lower than it is now. If memory serves me correctly it was about £50,000 per annum and when the Spencers and Magnolia Open Spaces were taken over the costs increased to the high 80’s and now over 100,000.
So when the Council decided to take over the Glencroft Open Space, I was concerned that the costs were fully understood before the land was taken over rather than discovered as the project proceeded.
When Hawkwell Parish Councl took the decision to take over the Glencroft Open Space on 12 June 2006 this was made without any presentation of the way it was to be managed and by implication the costs that will be incurred on a permanent basis together with those additional capital costs of plant and equipment that will be required,
As the Open Space is being taken over from Rochford District Council it would have been appropriate to find out exactly what current costs are being incurred by RDC. This has not be done.
I supported, with another 6 Councillors, a Motion on Notice to rescind the Council decision made on 12th June regarding the Glencroft Open Space.
Unfortunately the vote to protect your financial insterests was narrowly lost 8/6 and the project will proceed on a hand to mouth basis with the Parks Committee asking for money as required. What this will do to the figure raised as council tax I do not know.
This is the letter I sent to all councillors before the meeting in an attempt to get them to not commit unless the costs were known.
Rochford District Residents is Independent
September 16, 2006 by Editor · Leave a Comment
It has been pointed out to us that Hawkwell Residents’ Association say on their web site and in their newsletter that “The Association has been contacted by a number of members who are confused as to whether the Association is linked in some way to Rochford Residents. The Association has no links to this political party.”
I think that now is the time to clear some air.
Rochford District Residents is a registered local political party and we say that upfront on this page. We have two Councillors. Christine Mason has a seat on Hawkwell Parish Council and John has a seat on both Rochford District Council and Hawkwell District Council.
Barrier at the end of Hawkwell Park Drive
May 20, 2006 by Editor · Leave a Comment
This was discussed at Hawkwell Parish Council and passed back to John. With the Police and RDC it has now been decided to resolve the issue with a new barrier and fencing.
While I was out meeting people during the election the feedback I got was that the recent changes had been for the worse because the motor cyclists just roar down the road now and straight onto Clements Hall.
When I contacted RDC they said that this had been at the request of The Hawkwell Residents’ Association residents to let prams through.
John Mason
What goes on in the Local Elections?
May 18, 2006 by Editor · Leave a Comment
So what does go on in the Local Elections that shouldn’t and you don’t get to hear about? Read on to discover the level of activity that was undertaken against myself, an independent candidate in the 2006 Local Government Elections.
Abolition of The District Councils
May 18, 2006 by Editor · Leave a Comment
John Prescott now longer has the ODPM and David Miliband has moved on. Several senior civil servants are no longer involved. It is rumoured that the Government does not wish to take on some County and District Councils. The White Paper will now be published towards the end of October.
Recent election candidates for District Councils might find that the losers have the last laugh almost immediately as their office will most likely abolished with the District Councils as early as 2008 by the Labour Government.
The Labour Government is even thinking of calling off the next District Council elections due in 2007 to make way for early abolition of the District Councils.
Anti Social Behaviour and Vandalism
May 18, 2006 by Editor · 5 Comments
I recognised the issue of policing in my election address as a matter of concern not just for Hawkwell but the whole Rochford District. This is not just an issue for Hawkwell or its representives to address alone.
The situation will not be improved across the District unless the whole District Council acts and obtains the level of policing we require from the newly merged Rayleigh and Southend Division. As I said in my election address the Council is still awaiting the Divisional Commander, Chief Superintendent Folkard to come to a Council Meeting and explain the basis of resourcing we have and challenge that is insufficient.
In the meantime I have advised Essex Police again, and just a few weeks ago, of the concerns of residents about young people coming into Hockley and Hawkwell by train because they have been dispersed by law from Rochford. There have been joint operations between the Transport Police and Essex Police at Hockley Rail Station in the past and I have asked that this operation be renewed. I have also asked Essex Police to increase patrols in Hawkwell.